Home > News > "Computex 2025: Gaming Monitors Now Too Fast"

"Computex 2025: Gaming Monitors Now Too Fast"

Author:Kristen Update:May 21,2025

Three gaming monitors pushing the boundaries of refresh rates were showcased at Computex, highlighting the latest in display technology. The standout is the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG, a 1080p monitor boasting an astonishing 610Hz refresh rate. Meanwhile, both MSI and Acer have unveiled 1440p monitors with 500Hz refresh rates, which are challenging to power even with high-end setups like the RTX 5090 and multi-frame generation technology.

Acer's Predator X27U F5 stands out not only for its speed but also for its QD-OLED panel, promising exceptional color accuracy. Initially launching in Europe and China at a starting price of €899, Acer has confirmed that the monitor will eventually make its way to the US, though pricing details remain undisclosed due to ongoing tariff negotiations. Given the rising costs of tech products in the US, affordability might be a concern.

MSI's entry into this high-speed arena is the 27-inch MPG 271QR X50, also featuring a QD-OLED display. While pricing information was not disclosed, the monitor includes an innovative AI feature. According to PC Gamer's hands-on report, a small sensor at the bottom of the display detects when you step away, triggering the monitor to shut off via an NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This AI-driven approach to burn-in protection is particularly relevant for gaming monitors, which often display static images that could lead to pixel degradation. Although the AI aspect might raise some eyebrows, it's a step up from traditional OLED protection methods that can interrupt gameplay.

Do Gaming Monitors Need to Be This Fast?

The introduction of monitors with such high refresh rates, particularly the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG with its 610Hz capability, raises the question of necessity. At 1080p, this refresh rate is exceptionally fast, especially considering Nvidia's multi-frame generation technology, which can push frame rates beyond what most current hardware can handle. For instance, achieving such frame rates in a game like Marvel Rivals would require an RTX 5090 and potentially multi-frame generation, which can introduce latency—a concern in competitive gaming.

To fully leverage these high refresh rates, a robust CPU is essential, as it needs to supply the graphics card with data quickly enough to maintain those frame rates. Technologies like Nvidia Reflex and frame generation help, but at frame rates approaching 600 fps, a powerful CPU becomes non-negotiable.

The advantage of such high frame rates lies in the potential for incredibly low render latency, which is critical in competitive gaming. Games like Counter-Strike 2, where even the slightest advantage can be decisive, benefit from running at the highest possible frame rates to minimize input lag. However, whether the significant investment required for these monitors is justified for the average gamer remains a pertinent question.